Skip to content

PETER LOW IP LLP

Trade Mark Agents
Main navigation
  • Home
  • About us
  • Trade Mark Cases
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Singapore
    • United Kingdom
  • Contact

Category Archive: Singapore

Plaintiff’s plan to sue for TRADE MARK INFRINGEMENT ultimately backfired

In Triple D Trading Pte Ltd v Fanco Fan Marketing Pte Ltd [2022] SGHC 226, the plaintiff litigated the […]

Posted on 11 October 202211 October 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

Swatch Group’s opposition to Apple’s THINK DIFFERENT trade mark “not fully and properly pleaded”

Intellectual Property Office of Singapore Hearing Officer: See Tho Sok Yee, Principal Assistant Registrar (PAR) Decision Date: 21 […]

Posted on 26 September 202226 September 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

SPANISH BEER producers lock horns in TRADE MARK Dispute – ESTRELLA DAMM (word mark) v ESTRELLA GALICIA (composite mark)

In Sociedad Anonima Damm v Hijos de Rivera, S.A. [2022] SGIPOS 6, the IP Adjudicator determined that the Applicant’s Mark”” to […]

Posted on 27 May 202210 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

BIRD-IN-FLIGHT device DETERMINED to be “SIMILAR” to prior mark and denied registration

In Twitter, Inc. v V V Technology Pte Ltd [2022] SGIPOS 4, the Principal Assistant Registrar (“PAR”) Mark Lim decided that […]

Posted on 18 May 202210 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

APPELLATE DIVISION of the High Court Upheld Primary Judge’s Decision on DISTINCTIVENESS of “LUKE’S” in Trade Mark Dispute

In TMRG Pte Ltd and another v Caerus Holding Pte Ltd and another [2022] SGHC(A) 4, the Appellate Division […]

Posted on 9 May 202210 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

CIPRIANI & BARTENDER device Trade Mark Opposed by Hotel Cipriani S.P.A. on grounds including “Passing Off”

In Hotel Cipriani S.P.A. v Altunis – Trading, Gestão E Serviços, Sociedade Unipessoal, LDA [2022] SGIPOS 3, the PAR refused the […]

Posted on 14 April 202210 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

“DR WOLFF’S VAGISAN” trade mark held to be dissimilar to VAGISIL marks by High Court

High Court of Singapore Decision Date: 7 April 2022 Judge: Lee Seiu Kin J Appeal from: Dr August […]

Posted on 12 April 20229 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

HEYTEA trade mark in Class 30 subject of invalidation application before Trade Mark Office

In Shenzhen Meixixi Catering Management Co., Ltd. v Heetea Pte. Ltd. [2021] SGIPOS 12, the matter before the Principal Assistant Registrar […]

Posted on 1 March 202210 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

SUPERMARKET retailers Clash over use of “INDIAN SUPERMARKET” trade mark

In All India Supermart Pte Ltd v Indian Supermarket Pte Ltd and another [2021] SGHC 293, the case […]

Posted on 14 February 20229 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

Halal Certification Authority Pty Ltd v Flujo Sanguineo Holdings Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 1399

Federal Court of Australia Judge: BROMWICH J Date of Judgment: 12 November 2021 In Halal Certification Authority Pty Ltd […]

Posted on 24 January 20228 June 2022 AustraliaSingapore

FEDERAL COURT of AUSTRALIA determined “a2 MILK” & “TRUE A2” to be sufficiently distinctive for goods including milk and milk products

In The a2 Milk Company Limited v LD&D Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 1515, the a2 Milk Company Limited […]

Posted on 20 December 20218 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

“Dietary Drinks” in Class 5 determined to be SIMILAR GOODS to “non-alcoholic protein and/or energy drinks” in Class 32

In Weider Global Nutrition, LLC v Morinaga & Co., Ltd [2021] SGIPOS 15, the Principal Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks (“PAR”) […]

Posted on 6 December 202114 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

“Luke’s” held to be of Low Distinctiveness by Singapore High Court

In TMRG Pte Ltd and another v Caerus Holding Pte Ltd and another [2021] SGHC 163, the plaintiffs alleged […]

Posted on 3 November 202110 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks
woman with glass of water after shower
P P Read More

“VAGISAN” for Feminine Wash Declared INVALID by the High Court of Singapore

HARVARD CLUB OF SINGAPORE – Subject of TRADE MARK DISPUTE between “Ex-official Alumni Club” and “Harvard University”

In Harvard Club of Singapore v President and Fellows of Harvard College [2019] SGIPOS 14, the dispute was […]

Posted on 20 February 202113 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

CHAMPENGWINE Refused Trade Mark Registration due to “Bad Faith”

four clear champagne flutes
P P Read More

Intellectual Property Office of Singapore Hearings and Mediation Hearing Officer: Mr. Mark Lim, Principal Assistant Registrar of Trade […]

Posted on 5 October 202019 October 2021 SingaporeTrade Marks

HIGH COURT upheld Trade Marks Office Decision in dispute between HARVARD CLUB OF SINGAPORE and HARVARD UNIVERSITY

In Harvard Club of Singapore v President and Fellows of Harvard College [2020] SGHC 77, the High Court of […]

Posted on 13 June 202013 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks
© 2026 PETER LOW IP LLP.
Footer navigation
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Secondary navigation
  • Twitter
  • Feed
  • Mail
  • Search

Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.