Skip to content

PETER LOW IP LLP

Trade Mark Agents
Main navigation
  • Home
  • About us
  • Trade Mark Cases
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Singapore
    • United Kingdom
  • Contact

s 60 of Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)

FEDERAL COURT confirms “freshly brewed coffee” not goods of the same description  as “ready-to-drink coffee, tea” sold in cans 

Energy Beverages LLC v Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 113. In a trade mark dispute between energy drink […]

Posted on 8 April 20229 June 2022 AustraliaTrade Marks

Builders Dispute over the use of “Henley” Trade Mark

In Henley Arch Pty Ltd v Henley Constructions Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 1369, the Federal Court of Australia concluded that the […]

Posted on 10 November 20217 June 2022 AustraliaTrade Marks

PUMA’S “procat” mark held to be deceptively similar to CATERPILLAR’S Registered CAT marks

In Caterpillar Inc v Puma SE [2021] FCA 1014, the Federal Court of Australia held that procat was […]

Posted on 15 September 202118 October 2021 AustraliaTrade Marks

FEDERAL COURT Clarifies “Liability of Trade Mark Owners” through Authorised Use In Relation to Trade Mark Infringement Claim

pancake with maple syrup
P P Read More

The Federal Court of Australia, in PDP Capital Pty Ltd v Grasshopper Ventures Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1078, confirmed the […]

Posted on 17 June 202119 October 2021 AustraliaTrade Marks

Pony Club Australia Successful in Defending its Trade Mark Against RDA

silhouette of person riding horse on body of water under yellow sunset
P P Read More

Riding for the Disabled Association of Australia v Pony Club Australia Incorporated [2019] ATMO 63 Australian Trade Marks Office […]

Posted on 10 June 201919 October 2021 AustraliaTrade Marks
© 2026 PETER LOW IP LLP.
Footer navigation
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Secondary navigation
  • Twitter
  • Feed
  • Mail
  • Search

Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.