Skip to content

PETER LOW IP LLP

Trade Mark Agents
Main navigation
  • Home
  • About us
  • Trade Mark Cases
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Singapore
    • United Kingdom
  • Contact

Trade Mark Opposition

Swatch Group’s opposition to Apple’s THINK DIFFERENT trade mark “not fully and properly pleaded”

Intellectual Property Office of Singapore Hearing Officer: See Tho Sok Yee, Principal Assistant Registrar (PAR) Decision Date: 21 […]

Posted on 26 September 202226 September 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

“MANUKA HONEY” suffered a “bitter” setback in the UK due to lack of DISTINCTIVENESS

The UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) refused the registration of MANUKA HONEY as a certification mark on the […]

Posted on 23 September 202223 September 2022 Trade MarksUnited Kingdom

Opposing goods not “sufficiently similar” to amount to confusion in trade mark dispute before IPONZ

Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ) Hearing Officer: Virginia Nichols, Assistant Commissioner of Trade Marks Decision Date: […]

Posted on 16 September 202226 September 2022 New ZealandTrade Marks

GORGONZOLA for cheese registrable as certification trade mark in NEW ZEALAND

What does GORGONZOLA for cheese mean to the average consumer in New Zealand? In Consorzio per la Tutela del […]

Posted on 26 July 202226 July 2022 New ZealandTrade Marks

CIPRIANI & BARTENDER device Trade Mark Opposed by Hotel Cipriani S.P.A. on grounds including “Passing Off”

In Hotel Cipriani S.P.A. v Altunis – Trading, Gestão E Serviços, Sociedade Unipessoal, LDA [2022] SGIPOS 3, the PAR refused the […]

Posted on 14 April 202210 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

“DR WOLFF’S VAGISAN” trade mark held to be dissimilar to VAGISIL marks by High Court

High Court of Singapore Decision Date: 7 April 2022 Judge: Lee Seiu Kin J Appeal from: Dr August […]

Posted on 12 April 20229 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

KANGEN trade mark (for services in class 35) Refused Registration on grounds including bad faith

In Enagic Co Ltd v Horizons (Asia) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] FCA 1512, the Federal Court of Australia […]

Posted on 14 December 20217 June 2022 AustraliaTrade Marks

PUMA’S “procat” mark held to be deceptively similar to CATERPILLAR’S Registered CAT marks

In Caterpillar Inc v Puma SE [2021] FCA 1014, the Federal Court of Australia held that procat was […]

Posted on 15 September 202118 October 2021 AustraliaTrade Marks

“VAGISAN” Refused Registration by FULL COURT – overturning decision at 1st Instance in Trade Mark Battle for “Feminine Care”

white ceramic sink beside window
P P Read More

In Combe International Ltd v Dr August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel [2021] FCAFC 8, the Federal Court of Australia […]

Posted on 20 May 202118 October 2021 AustraliaTrade Marks

In review: B.R. succeeded in opposing “Recherché” mark

hands woman girl morning
P P Read More

In B.R. v Elements Cosmeceuticals Pte. Ltd. [2021] SGIPOS 3, the Principal Assistant Registrar (“PAR”) refused the registration of […]

Posted on 8 May 202119 October 2021 Trade Marks

HARVARD CLUB OF SINGAPORE – Subject of TRADE MARK DISPUTE between “Ex-official Alumni Club” and “Harvard University”

In Harvard Club of Singapore v President and Fellows of Harvard College [2019] SGIPOS 14, the dispute was […]

Posted on 20 February 202113 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

CAESAR Successful in Opposing CAESARSTONE before the Full Court

three stainless steel forks near apple
P P Read More

In Ceramiche Caesar S.P.A. v Caesarstone Ltd [2020] FCAFC 124, the Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) overturned the […]

Posted on 11 August 202019 October 2021 AustraliaTrade Marks

GORGONZOLA refused trade mark registration in AUSTRALIA

In US Dairy Export Council v Consorzio Per La Tutela Del Formaggio Gorgonzola [2020] ATMO 44 , the delegate […]

Posted on 20 June 202020 August 2022 AustraliaTrade Marks

HIGH COURT upheld Trade Marks Office Decision in dispute between HARVARD CLUB OF SINGAPORE and HARVARD UNIVERSITY

In Harvard Club of Singapore v President and Fellows of Harvard College [2020] SGHC 77, the High Court of […]

Posted on 13 June 202013 June 2022 SingaporeTrade Marks

THE NORTH FACE Apparel Loses Appeal in New Zealand Apex Court

positive young asian woman touching cheeks in snowy forest
P P Read More

In The North Face Apparel Corporation v Sanyang Industry Company Limited [2014] NZCA 398, the New Zealand Court of […]

Posted on 18 February 202018 October 2021 New ZealandTrade Marks
© 2026 PETER LOW IP LLP.
Footer navigation
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Secondary navigation
  • Twitter
  • Feed
  • Mail
  • Search

Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.